A fresh political storm erupted in the United States after Representative Ro Khanna publicly disclosed several previously hidden names linked to Jeffrey Epstein documents. The Democrat said lawmakers uncovered these identities after reviewing unredacted files at the Department of Justice (DOJ). The move has intensified debate over transparency and accountability surrounding the late financier’s extensive network.
Khanna announced the names during remarks on the House floor, claiming lawmakers pressured officials to release details that had earlier remained concealed. The latest disclosures have sparked renewed scrutiny of Epstein’s past relationships and raised new questions about the scale of information still under wraps.
Who Are The Six “Wealthy, Powerful Men” Named In Epstein Files?
During his speech, Khanna identified six men whose names had earlier appeared with heavy redactions in official records. The individuals include Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonic Leonov, Nicola Caputo, Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, and billionaire businessman Leslie Wexner.
The lawmaker did not accuse the men of criminal wrongdoing but argued that the public deserved clarity about why their identities remained hidden for so long. Reports suggest that none of the six have faced criminal charges connected to Epstein’s activities.
The announcement followed a joint review of files by Khanna and Republican Representative Thomas Massie, who also criticised the earlier redactions and called for greater disclosure.
Identity Revealed In Controversial ‘Torture Video’ Email
Another major development involved a previously redacted identity connected to a 2009 email exchange referencing a “torture video.” The message reportedly read, “Where are you? Are you ok? I loved the torture video”.
Officials later confirmed that the recipient was Emirati businessman Sultan Bin Sulayem. Authorities have not clarified what the message referred to or whether it indicated any criminal activity. Lawmakers emphasised that releasing names does not equate to allegations of guilt but reflects efforts to ensure transparency within the investigative process.
Why Did Lawmakers Demand The Names Be Unredacted?
Khanna and Massie said they found several identities hidden without clear justification after reviewing millions of pages of documents. They urged the DOJ to disclose any redactions that did not meet congressional standards.
Lawmakers argued that public confidence requires openness, particularly in a case that has drawn global attention for years. Critics say the continuing secrecy fuels conspiracy theories and prevents victims from receiving full answers.
What Happens Next In The Epstein Files Investigation?
The DOJ continues to face pressure from both political parties to release additional material from the vast archive of documents. Lawmakers expect further disclosures as congressional oversight expands.
Meanwhile, analysts warn that naming individuals without charges could trigger legal and ethical debates. Investigators still examine remaining files, with lawmakers suggesting that more revelations may emerge in the coming months.
The ongoing controversy shows that the Epstein case remains far from closed, as officials balance public interest with legal protections.
