Steven Spielberg is back in the alien genre with Disclosure Day, and while the film hit Indian theaters on June 12, it arrived with a slightly different script than the rest of the world saw. The CBFC cleared the sci-fi thriller for a U/A 13+ rating, but not before ordering a few last-minute mutes. If you’re heading to the cinema this weekend, don’t be surprised if the dialogue feels a little “sanitized.”
What got muted on Disclosure Day?
It’s pretty standard for the Censor Board to trim down swearing for Indian theatrical releases, but the specific choices here have sparked a bit of a conversation online. According to industry reports and social media chatter, the board flagged the word “sex” and the classic “fk” for removal.
The “sex” edit is the one getting the most heat. There’s a pivotal scene between Daniel Kellner (Josh O’Connor) and his girlfriend Jane (Eve Hewson) where the dialogue touches on her past as a nun. When the conversation turns to her former intimate life, the board decided the word needed to be muted in both the audio and the subtitles. The “f-word” was also cut from two separate scenes, leaving a few jarring pauses for anyone familiar with Spielberg’s original edit.
Is It Still Worth the Ticket?
Censorship drama aside, Disclosure Day is a massive production. Emily Blunt carries the film as a Kansas City meteorologist who unexpectedly finds herself the guardian of alien knowledge, with Josh O’Connor playing the cybersecurity expert who blows the whistle.
Clocking in at 145 minutes, it’s a dense, conspiracy-heavy ride. The reviews have been a bit of a mixed bag; some critics are calling it peak Spielberg—praising a four-minute “oner” shot that is already being talked about as one of his best technical feats. Others think the plot gets a little lost in the weeds. If you’re a fan of high-stakes, intelligent sci-fi, Blunt’s performance is worth the price of admission alone.
Why Are Fans Annoyed?
For a lot of film buffs, this isn’t just about a few missing words. It’s about the feeling that the CBFC is being a bit over-protective, especially for a U/A 13+ rated movie. If the film is already intended for a teen audience that is likely used to hearing these words in modern media, why the heavy-handed edit?
This is just the latest in a string of recent censorship debates—people are still bringing up the edits for Superman (2025). It really highlights the ongoing tension between global filmmakers trying to tell raw, human stories and the local regulatory guidelines they have to navigate. It’s one more reminder that the version you see in the multiplex isn’t always the version the director intended.
ALSO READ: Cocktail 2 Gets An ‘A’ Certificate, Marking Kriti Sanon’s First Adult-Rated Film
