A few weeks ago, The Sunday Guardian wrote an article on six questions that could divide the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP). Among the key concerns raised was patriarchy and how the movement would challenge misogyny within its ranks and respond to criticism from opponents. Now, that question has come into sharper focus as social media users question why CJP’s leadership and spokesperson team remains entirely male.
Why Is CJP Facing Allegations of Misogyny?
The debate deepens after critics pointed out that the party’s initial spokesperson panel consisted of three men Saurav Das, Ashutosh Ranka and Vijeta Dahiya. Netizens argued that a movement claiming to represent change should reflect gender diversity in its leadership structure.
The criticism comes at a time when CJP is rapidly expanding its online influence and attracting a large youth following across the country.
Why is there no woman spokesperson in the CJP?
We did offered the role to our female team members, but many told us they would prefer to be actively involved without being at the forefront due to the constant online attacks and threats we are receiving. We respect their…
— Abhijeet Dipke (@abhijeet_dipke) June 3, 2026
No Women Spokespersons in the Party?
Responding to the controversy, CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke recently addressed the issue on social media.
According to Dipke, women members were offered spokesperson roles, but several declined due to concerns over online abuse, threats and harassment directed at people associated with the movement.
He said that many female volunteers preferred to contribute actively behind the scenes rather than become public faces of the campaign because of the hostile environment surrounding the movement.
Did CJP Invite Women to Lead the Movement?
Dipke said CJP is still open to women in leadership roles and the party has publicly invited young women who are keen to step forward to join the movement as its spokespersons and leaders.
The response is being seen as a response to accusations that the party is actively sidelining women from key roles.
Is Gender Equality Becoming More Than a Catchphrase?
CJP previously called for a 50% reservation for women in Parliament and addressing gender equality has become part of its stated agenda. But sceptics say symbolic pledges are perhaps not enough.
It remains unclear how the party addresses issues such as gender-based inequality in the workplace, gender-based violence, online harassment and cynicism towards women among its supporters.
CJP is preparing for the June 6 mobilisation led by Dipke when downplays on female representation could be a major litmus test for the movement. For a party that aspires to a national footprint, addressing leadership gaps and the lack of women participation within the movement could be as important as being strong on larger political issues.
