Categories: News

Pak bluster on India-in-Balochistan is without material evidence

Pakistan has admitted that the dossiers given to the United States and the United Nations Secretary General on what it described as “India’s involvement” in terrorism in Pakistan does not contain any “material evidence”. Instead, it claimed, the files contained “pattern and narrative” of “Indian involvement”. This was disclosed to Pakistan’s Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs on Thursday by Pakistan’s Adviser on Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz. While testifying before the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, which met with Senator Nuzhat Sadiq in the chair, Aziz claimed that “The dossiers have been meticulously prepared, but material evidence cannot be shared for the sake of protecting the sources.”
Sartaz Aziz had first talked about the three dossiers ahead of the India-Pakistan National Security Advisers’ meeting, which got cancelled in August. His statement led to much media hype in Pakistan that Islamabad, after decades of complaining about Indian role in terrorism in the country, was finally readying to present credible evidence to the world. Following the cancellation of the bilateral NSA talks, the dossiers were given to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon by Pakistan’s Permanent Representative in the UN, Dr Maleeha Lodhi. The same were also shared by Sartaj Aziz with US Secretary of State John Kerry during Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s visit to Washington last month.
The dossiers, according to previous official statements, contained proof about “Indian involvement in Balochistan, Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) and Karachi”.
In fact, while talking to the media after his US visit, Sartaj Aziz had claimed that the dossiers would help build a narrative about “India’s patronage of subversive activities in Pakistan”.
Pakistan Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhry told the committee that the contents of the dossiers — although they do not contain any material evidence — could be shared with the members of the panel only in an “in-camera” session due to “the sensitivity of the matter”.
With inputs from Dawn
demo6

Recent Posts

Israel approves US-brokered ceasefire in Gaza

The three-stage ceasefire starts with an initial six-week phase when hostages held by Hamas will…

2 days ago

Musk hosts India Global Forum business delegation

Washington: In a first-of-its-kind event, Elon Musk hosted a delegation of leading Indian business figures…

2 days ago

Drone attack sparks fire at Russian oil storage depot

Kaluga Governor said that a fire had broken out after an industrial site was hit…

2 days ago

‘China ready to enhance political mutual trust with Bangladesh’

China expressed its readiness to boost political mutual trust, deepen Belt and Road cooperation with…

2 days ago

Cong moves SC seeking intervention in 1991 Places of Worship Act

New Delhi: The Indian National Congress on Thursday moved the Supreme Court to intervene in…

2 days ago

Court to pronounce quantum of sentences on January 20

Thiruvananthapuram: The Additional District Sessions Court in Neyyattinkara will pronounce on Monday, January 20, the…

2 days ago