Newly released Epstein interview footage shows him downplaying sex crimes, rejecting predator labels, and defending his wealth, reigniting global scrutiny.
He objected to being categorised as a “class three sexual predator,” the highest threat classification, and instead described himself as “the lowest.” (Photo: Social Media)
Newly released video footage of Jeffrey Epstein has once again pushed the disgraced financier into global focus, as he appears to minimise his crimes and dismiss the scale of his sexual abuse allegations. The footage, part of a large release of US Department of Justice documents, shows Epstein portraying himself as a minor offender despite his criminal record and the serious federal charges he faced before he died in 2019.
The interview, recorded in 2011, runs close to two hours and captures Epstein attempting to reshape the narrative around his actions, presenting a stark contrast to how investigators and victims described his conduct.
In the interview, Epstein responds to pointed questions about his crimes, wealth, and public image. When asked whether he saw himself as “the devil,” Epstein brushed aside the label with a smile and rejected the idea that he ranked among the most dangerous sexual offenders under US law.
He objected to being categorised as a “class three sexual predator,” the highest threat classification, and instead described himself as “the lowest.”
BREAKING: 🚨 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 The FULL Jeffrey Epstein Interview with Steve Bannon.
— ADAM (@AdameMedia) February 1, 2026
Before it gets removed…pic.twitter.com/arn509xl5P
While Epstein admitted that he had committed a crime, he consistently downplayed its seriousness, despite his 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from an underage girl and the federal sex trafficking charges pending at the time of his death.
During the interview, Epstein faced questions about the origins of his wealth and the perception of his influence. When asked whether his money was “dirty money,” he insisted it was legally earned, though he acknowledged that ethics could be subjective.
In response to a direct question, “Are you the devil himself?”, Epstein replied, “No, but I do have a good mirror.”
In another moment that shocked viewers, Epstein suggested that authorities treated him as someone powerful rather than dangerous.
“One of the reasons they kept me in solitary confinement was that they were afraid that everyone would want to know which stocks to buy.”
The footage remained unreleased for more than a decade, raising questions about why it surfaced only now. The interviewer is believed to be Steve Bannon, a former adviser to President Donald Trump, adding a political dimension to the renewed debate.
The interview shows Epstein speaking confidently about his connections, influence, and intellectual standing, offering insight into how he viewed himself even after public disgrace.
Epstein used parts of the interview to defend his legacy, pointing to charitable initiatives he supported, including efforts related to polio eradication in Pakistan and India. Critics argue these claims reflect an attempt to soften his image rather than genuine accountability.
Documents released alongside the footage indicate that Epstein maintained regular communication with influential figures and even offered to assist in promoting political ideas abroad.
The latest release has reignited debate around the network of powerful individuals associated with Epstein over the years. The documents reference his ties with prominent names from politics, business, and entertainment, further intensifying public demand for transparency.
As millions of pages, images, and videos continue to emerge, the footage highlights the deep gap between how Epstein saw himself and how the justice system, victims, and the public viewed his actions.
The resurfacing of this footage underscores why Epstein’s case continues to provoke anger and unanswered questions years after his death. It reinforces concerns about accountability, influence, and how wealth and power may have shielded him for years.
For many, the interview does not humanise Epstein, but exposes a man unwilling to accept the gravity of his crimes, even when confronted directly.
