Categories: World

Geneva Deadlock: US-Iran Nuclear Talks Collapse Without Deal as War Drums Beat Louder – Carriers, F-22s Ready in Mideast?

US-Iran indirect talks in Geneva end without a nuclear deal as American F-22 jets and carrier groups mass in the Middle East. More talks set for Vienna next week.

Published by Prakriti Parul

High-stakes indirect talks between the United States and Iran over Tehran's nuclear programme concluded Thursday without an agreement, as the White House weighs military action that would mark its largest Middle East intervention in decades. Mediators announced further technical-level negotiations next week in Vienna, but no evidence emerged that the two sides had narrowed differences on Iran's right to enrich uranium or the fate of its enriched stockpiles.

Why Did Geneva Nuclear Talks End Without a Deal?

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called sessions "intense and longest," claiming good progress, but no evidence shows sides closer on enrichment rights or highly enriched uranium stocks. US special envoy Steve Witkoff found Iranian proposals disappointing; second session ended abruptly. Omani mediators highlight "creative ideas" exchanged openly despite standoff.

What Are Core Sticking Points in US-Iran Nuclear Dispute?

US demands permanent guarantees barring weapon-grade enrichment, full inspections, and dismantling Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan—sites Trump says US bombs obliterated last June. Iran rejects zero enrichment forever, facility destruction, or shipping 8,000kg stockpile (including 400kg at 60% purity, enough for 5-6 bombs) to US. Tehran proposes low-level enrichment under UN watch after 3-5 years, down-blending stockpiles domestically.

How Does US Military Buildup Factor Into Talks Pressure?

Trump has deployed two carrier groups (USS Abraham Lincoln, Gerald Ford), F-22 Raptors at Ovda, attack jets, refuelers, Tomahawk submarines—largest Mideast intervention in decades. President considers strikes for regime flexibility or change; commanders won't hold forces indefinitely. Araghchi pushes back on US media reports demanding total enrichment halt.

What Roles Do Ballistic Missiles Play in Impasse?

Secretary of State Marco Rubio calls Iran's missile program—some reaching 1,300 miles, growing yearly—a US threat, hitting bases or homeland. Iran deems them defensive, refuses non-nuclear talks on missiles or "resistance groups." Esmaeil Baghaei cites US demand inconsistencies.

Who Are Key Players Shaping Next Vienna Round?

Omani mediators predict technical talks; IAEA chief Rafael Grossi verifies low-enrichment guarantees. Araghchi leads Iran; Witkoff heads US. Tehran blocks IAEA damage inspections post-June strikes. Rubio notes: "They’re not enriching now, but trying to resume."

What is the IAEA's role?

The director general of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi, has moved centre stage in the talks. His imprimatur is needed to convince Washington that Iran's guarantees on future low-level enrichment can be technically verified. Tehran has refused IAEA access to inspect damage at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan since the US attack in June 2025.

FAQs

Q: When and where are next US-Iran nuclear talks?

A: Technical level next week in Vienna, per Omani mediators.

Q: What uranium stockpile does IAEA flag?

A: 400kg at 60% purity (5-6 bombs); 8,000kg total at 20% or below.

Q: Which sites does US want dismantled?

A: Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan, hit by US bombs June 2025.

Q: What did Araghchi say about Geneva progress?

A: "Good progress" in "most intense" rounds; more contacts soon.

Q: Why missiles matter to Rubio?

A: Range grows yearly, threatens US soil and regional bases.

Disclaimer: This information is based on inputs from news agency reports. TSG does not independently confirm the information provided by the relevant sources.

Prakriti Parul