Home > World > ‘I Won’t Use Force, We Don’t Need it for Rare Earths’: Trump Explains Why the US Wants Greenland at Davos 2026 | What We Know

‘I Won’t Use Force, We Don’t Need it for Rare Earths’: Trump Explains Why the US Wants Greenland at Davos 2026 | What We Know

US vs Greenland: Trump says he won’t use force to take Greenland but insists US control is vital for security, reviving debate over Arctic strategy and sovereignty.

By: Amreen Ahmad
Last Updated: January 21, 2026 22:43:35 IST

Trump vs Greenland: US President Donald Trump spoke at Davos and Greenland kept coming up. He ruled out military invasion to take the Arctic territory, but he reaffirmed his conviction that Greenland is of vital importance to US security. His comments calmed nervous financial markets and the stock market reversed earlier losses-but they also raised new questions about diplomacy, self-determination and the growing scope of America’s strategic ambitions in the Arctic. Greenland has a population of less than 60,000 people, but it’s at the center of an emerging geopolitical rivalry as melting ice opens new shipping routes and changes military equations.

Trump’s Message at Davos

Speaking to a mix of business figures and politicians, Trump made it clear that force was not an option. “I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force,” he said, urging immediate talks with Denmark. He presented the situation as a matter of security, not land grabs. He reminded listeners that the United States had shielded Greenland during World War II and challenged Denmark’s gratitude, calling it “ungrateful.” That comment lingered with European officials, who listened with cautious unease.

Security Over Resources

Trump indicated that Greenland’s strategic value lies not in its mineral resources but in its geography. Though the Arctic region holds estimated 13% of worldwide undiscovered oil reserves and 30 percent of unexplored natural gas resources, Trump rejected the resource of rare earth minerals as being strategic. However, Trump emphasized that Greenland holds a strategic position in national and international security with only America having the capacity to secure this resource-rich region.

Markets, NATO & Global Signals

The fact that Trump asserted he would not take Greenland by force caused market ripples and this led to a gain in the Dow by 0.4%, the S&P 500’s rise by 0.3% and the slight increase in the Nasdaq after his statements. He also claimed that the NATO alliance would be stronger, not weaker, in American hands, echoing his repeated sentiments that the alliance over-relies on American strength and that this needs to change. This follows that the space base in Greenland’s Pituffik continues to be an essential component in missile warning and Arctic surveillance, a result of the Cold War era.

Why Greenland is still Matters

Strategically, Greenland is located on some of the shortest routes connecting North America with Europe, routes which connect the US with Russia. With the reduction of the Arctic ice cap, military leaders recognize increasing risks with the increasing presence of rival nations in the region. Trump’s comments reflect a shift in US policy, which begins to view the Arctic not as a remote, polarized or isolated region, but instead as a front-line arena of potential future competition among nations.

Most Popular

The Sunday Guardian is India’s fastest
growing News channel and enjoy highest
viewership and highest time spent amongst
educated urban Indians.

The Sunday Guardian is India’s fastest growing News channel and enjoy highest viewership and highest time spent amongst educated urban Indians.

© Copyright ITV Network Ltd 2025. All right reserved.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?