Cecilia Steen has drawn attention due to her emails and interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, as revealed in the latest Justice Department disclosures
Cecilia Steen Revealed Her Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein Explained (Source: Instagram)
Epstein Files Case: Cecilia Steen reportedly became one of the most centric figure after several of her email exchanges with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were made public in the latest Justice Department release. The final batch of Epstein-related files, released on Friday, allowed public access to emails through Jmail, a browser-based archive.
It was noted that the archive had been created under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA) by the US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, modeled after the Gmail interface to allow users to search through Epstein communications.
In addition to the emails, Steen’s name reportedly appeared in the Epstein library, which the Justice Department had made publicly accessible. According to reports, her name appeared in relation to a FedEx shipment, though the emails provided more insight into her interactions with Epstein.
The emails reportedly revealed that Cecilia Steen had spent a significant amount of time in Dubai and often complained about life there or invited Epstein to visit. Reports suggested she had an MBA degree and worked in the corporate sector.
According to one 2007 email, Steen reportedly informed Epstein that she had been headhunted for a position at Island Global Yachting in Dubai and requested his approval for the role.
Reports also indicated that she faced employment instability in Dubai, stating that she was out of work and exhausted, with many potential leads but no solid opportunities.
The emails reportedly suggested that Cecilia Steen had a warm and affectionate relationship with Epstein. Sources tracking individuals named in Epstein documents said that she expressed sympathy in emails about a lawsuit involving Donald Trump.
It was also reported that her name appeared during discussions about FedEx shipments in connection with the trial of Epstein’s associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. A civil discovery request in litigation against the Epstein estate reportedly listed Steen among many individuals whose documents were being sought, related to “house staff, employees, or individuals compensated by Epstein or affiliated entities.”
Publicly available Epstein databases, sources noted, did not show Cecilia Steen in flight logs or Epstein’s “black book.” Instead, she was mentioned in emails, shipping records, and internal manuals. It was emphasized that Steen had not been charged with any crime linked to Epstein.
Some emails reportedly revealed the emotional tone of Steen’s correspondence with Epstein. In one email, she was said to have written that she thought about him daily and wished she could make things better, adding that he had given her a very happy life.
She is working for JP Morgan now. She seems to be eternally gratefut that JE employed her, help her to pay her MBA in STERN and seems that he respected her. https://t.co/ciBryT1Igr pic.twitter.com/BAnCjhNJAj
— Proyecto Kennis (@ProyectoKennis) February 5, 2026
Sources also indicated that in the same email, she described her employer, noting that he had been jailed for an economic crime in Finland but had been released after 18 months. She reportedly wrote that she always carried Epstein in her heart wherever she went.
Another email reportedly referenced American businessman Andrew Farkas. Steen reportedly asked Epstein about the terms turtle and elskling, to which Epstein allegedly replied that she was too young to know. Analysts explained that ‘elskling’ is a Norwegian term of endearment meaning “beloved.”
It was noted that while Cecilia Steen appeared in multiple Epstein-related emails and documents, there was no evidence linking her to criminal activity according to public records. Analysts and observers reportedly said that her presence in the files highlighted the complex web of personal and professional relationships surrounding Epstein, rather than proving wrongdoing.
