A series of audio recordings purportedly from a man named Sasha or Sascha Riley has kicked off frenzied argument on all social media platforms. Widely shared on Substack and up and coming networks, the recordings make grave claims connected with the long-running Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Not a single one of the claims has been authenticated by any courts of law and law enforcement agencies or reputable news organizations, but their distribution shows how unverified testimony can take on a life of its own in a hurry and shape public discussion.
Who is Sasha Riley?
Sasha Riley appears as a war veteran with honors from his experience fighting the Iraq war, having also claimed that he escaped being trafficked as a child. This video appears to have been recorded as part of recorded conversations held on the phone by an individual with no affiliation with the media or investigating bodies, with the date being July 2025. Riley adopted children from the latter part of the 1970s and claimed child abuse from early childhood.
What are the Viral Audio Recordings Alleging?
The released material is six audio recordings, which is according to the publisher are unedited. In those recordings, Riley recounts experiences of alleged trafficking between the ages of nine and thirteen including claims of extreme violence and exploitation. The publisher says the recordings were released in the public interest and that Riley has indicated a willingness to testify or undergo a polygraph test. No official investigation has publicly confirmed receiving or verifying these recordings.
Which Public Figures Are Named in the Allegations?
The most contentious part of this testimony is where it accuses well-known political and judicial figures of complicity in the abuse network. These allegations only show up in the unverified audio recording and accompanying voices. Nothing exists in terms of indictments, court records or verified investigations that accuse these people of complicity in these allegations.
What Evidence Is Being Claimed?
The publisher that comes with the audio recordings claims that there are other resources available such as documents and reports, as well as media files that support the statements being presented. There are references to police records and documents that can be accessed by public information requests and are reported to be with the police department. None of the resources have been verified or validated. It has been pointed out that until the statements are verified by the authorities, the allegations are merely allegations and not fact.
