North Maharashtra, Marathwada will prove decisive for Assembly elections

NEW DELHI: The Northern and Marathwada regions...

Punjab gets more houses sanctioned than Haryana under PMAY-U

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs launched...

DMRC accused of non-payment

NewsDMRC accused of non-payment

The authorities, however, hold that the suppliers are barking up the wrong tree.

 

New Delhi: A number of independent suppliers of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited (DMRC) have alleged non-payment of dues by the corporation in relation to its Pink line project for the past two and a half years. The suppliers have now been sitting on a dharna opposite Mayur Vihar Phase-I metro station for last 104 days asking the DMRC authorities to release their long pending payment amounting to Rs 13 crore against the raw materials supplied by them.

The agitating suppliers told The Sunday Guardian that the initial contract of Project CC-18 was awarded to FEMC-Pratibha JV but the contract was terminated mid-way for some reason one and a half year ago. The reason behind termination of the contract could not be known despite several efforts as there was no response from FEMC-Pratibha JV officials on the matter.

Speaking to this newspaper, Izhar Chowdhary, one of the 51 suppliers whose supplies have gone unpaid, said, “Chief Project Manager (CPM)-3 of Project CC-18 Mr Ashwini Kumar had previously assured us about releasing our payments once DMRC realises the bank guarantee of Rs 108 crore by Pratibha. But though the Pink line metro became operational months ago, we still haven’t received our dues.”

The suppliers claimed that “the DMRC has already realised the bank guarantee on 4 September 2018” but still delaying their payments.

Responding to the allegation, Mohinder Yadav, who is a part of the corporate communications department at DMRC, stated that the DMRC does not deal with the sub-contractors directly. “We go through the main contractor and the work is done according to the tender given to the hired contractor company. Further, if any issue arises we can’t help directly, we can only create a pressure to resolve the issue.”

DMRC is accused of delaying payments and dilly-dallying with the suppliers since October 2018 without giving a definite date for clearing the dues. “It’s been almost three years that I haven’t received any payment for the materials I had supplied to the tune of Rs 40 lakh. This has affected my business and family a lot. It’s been over 90 days that I am coming here every day for the dharna but so far it has been a futile exercise,” lamented R.P. Dalmia, another aggrieved suppliers.

“We tried to reach the concerned ministers and authorities through letters. So far, we have sent letters to Union Minister of State for Housing and Urban Affairs Hardeep Singh Puri, Transport Minister of Delhi Kailash Gahlot and DMRC Managing Director Dr Mangu Singh, but unfortunately haven’t received any responses from anyone,” added Chowdhary.

The entire scenario casts a blanket of uncertainty over the future of these suppliers as DMRC, while delaying payments for one project, has seemingly cleared dues of project CC-23 (metro line from Hauz Khas to Kalkaji) after its suppliers held a similar dharna for 72 days.

“It is very shameful that I have to sit on dharna for my money. I want to ask as to why DMRC is delaying the payments even after realising the bank guarantee and harassing us every day,” said B.K. Sharma, a plywood supplier waiting for his Rs 41 Lakh.

DMRC officials told The Sunday Guardian that they are aware about the agitation. However, they sought to clarify that the agitators were not directly hired by the corporation but are a section of the vendors and material suppliers hired by one of its main contractors, FEMC-Pratibha JV. Hence, they cannot do anything in the matter as it is a dispute between the company and its suppliers.

“We would like to clarify that none of these agencies have been directly hired by DMRC for any work in Project CC-18 which was awarded to FEMC-Pratibha JV. Accordingly, DMRC does not have any type of contractual relationship in this regard and is therefore not liable for payment of any of these dues. In fact, the contractor has already been directed many times to settle their issues with these
agencies.”

- Advertisement -

Check out our other content

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles