Trump’s Gaza proposal violates international law and human rights

International law prohibits the forcible transfer of civilians from their homeland.

U.S. President Donald Trump has suggested that the United States should take over the Gaza Strip and relocate its two million Palestinian residents. This proposal is not only impractical but also a blatant violation of international law and human rights.
First and foremost, international law prohibits the forcible transfer of civilians from their homeland. The Fourth Geneva Convention explicitly states that individuals cannot be forcibly removed from their territories unless their security or military necessity demands it. Trump’s proposal, which involves the displacement of two million Palestinians, clearly violates this principle.

Furthermore, the right to return to one’s homeland is enshrined in international human rights instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Palestinians in Gaza have a legitimate right to remain in their homes and communities, and any attempt to forcibly relocate them would be an infringement on their fundamental human rights. This right is not only a legal obligation but also a moral imperative that respects the dignity and autonomy of the people affected.
The suggestion also disregards the severe humanitarian consequences that would result from such a massive displacement. The trauma of forced relocation, loss of property, and the disruption of social networks would have long-lasting effects on the Palestinian population. It would exacerbate the already dire situation in Gaza, where residents face significant challenges related to poverty, unemployment, and access to essential services.
Additionally, the proposal undermines the principle of self-determination, which is a cornerstone of international law. The Palestinian people have the right to determine their political status and pursue their economic, social, and cultural development. Any external interference that disregards this right is not only illegal but also counterproductive to the pursuit of a just and lasting peace in the region.

In conclusion, Trump’s statement advocating for the US takeover of the Gaza Strip and the forced relocation of its residents is not only illogical but also a violation of international law and human rights. It fails to acknowledge the legal protections afforded to the Palestinian people

and the severe humanitarian impact of such an action. Instead of proposing radical and unlawful measures, the focus should be on fostering dialogue, upholding human rights, and supporting sustainable solutions that respect the dignity and rights of all parties involved.

* The nephew of the Dalai Lama, Khedroob Thondup is a geopolitical analyst.