The ‘mystery’ of thriving political dynasties

Scores of inheritors in sports, cinema and...

India-EU relations set to grow

Whatever the outcome of the EU election...

Neighbours expect Modi 3.0 to transform the region

Economic cooperation remains a pivotal aspect of...

SC seeks Centre’s response on marital rape case

Legally SpeakingSC seeks Centre’s response on marital rape case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court issued notice to the Centre a plea challenging the retention of the marital rape exception in the new criminal law, Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud stated that the matter would be tagged with a petition challenging the same provision in the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and scheduled for July.

The All India Democratic Women’s Association (AIDWA) filed the plea, with Senior Advocate Karuna Nundy representing the petitioner. Previously, several petitions were submitted to the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the marital rape exception under IPC provisions.

One petition opposes a Karnataka High Court ruling that refused to dismiss rape charges against a man accused of raping and holding his wife as a sex slave. Another petition aims to strike down Exception 2 to Section 375 of the IPC, which shields husbands from criminal charges for non-consensual intercourse with their wives.

This petition was filed by activist Ruth Manorama through advocate on record Ruchira Goel.

Exception 2 to Section 375 of the IPC, which defines rape, stipulates that sexual intercourse by a man with his wife is not considered rape unless the wife is below 15 years of age. Previously, the All India Democratic Women’s Association (AIDWA), among others, approached the Supreme Court over the Delhi High Court’s split verdict on criminalizing marital rape.

On May 12, 2022, a two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court delivered a split verdict on the matter. Justice Rajiv Shakdher favored criminalization, while Justice Hari Shankar dissented, holding that Exception 2 to Section 375 does not violate the Constitution as it is based on intelligible differences.

- Advertisement -

Check out our other content

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles