BJP accuses Mamata of inciting ‘anti-Hindu violence’

‘Targeted violence is happening and Mamata Banerjee...

Tensions Rise in Manipur Over Meitei’s Thangjing Pilgrimage as Kuki Women Block Entry

Tensions flared in Manipur as Meitei pilgrims faced resistance from Kuki-Zo communities blocking access to the sacred Thangjing hills. Protests erupted across buffer zones, citing territorial concerns, while Meiteis asserted religious rights. Authorities urged caution to avoid further hostility.

Time for a strategic shift in India’s Korea policy

On 4 April 2025, South Korea witnessed...

SC issues notice to centre, BCI on plea for Bar Council

Legally SpeakingSC issues notice to centre, BCI on plea for Bar Council

New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India on Friday directed the Centre, the Bar Council of India, and other relevant authorities to respond to a Public Interest Litigation requesting the establishment of a Bar Council in Jammu & Kashmir.

The PIL was filed by the Kashmir Advocates Association, represented by senior advocate Javid Shaikh.

A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta issued notices to the Centre, the BCI, and the Registrar General of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

A Bar Council is a statutory entity responsible for regulating the enrollment of law graduates as lawyers and overseeing the legal practice within a state

इस शब्द का अर्थ जानिये
. In his submissions, Shaikh, assisted by advocate Adil Muneer Andrabi, stressed the importance of setting up a Bar Council in Jammu and Kashmir.

He also sought interim relief, emphasizing the need for government-issued welfare stamps on pleadings, a practice generally facilitated by Bar Councils.

Shaikh pointed out that in the absence of a Bar Council, the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir had been handling the functions typically assigned to such a body.

However, the bench indicated it was not in a position to pass an interim order at this stage, allowing the current system to remain in place for now.

The bench also inquired whether the High Court was a party to the case, before deciding to issue notices to the concerned parties.

The matter has been scheduled for further hearing in 4 weeks.

- Advertisement -

Check out our other content

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles