The Narendra Modi-led National Democratic Alliance government did well in recently slashing the items that attracted a 28% Goods & Services Tax rate. Certainly the move was welcomed across the country, including in the state that was soon to go to the polls, Gujarat. In this context, the Election Commission of India must have had weighty reasons for not clubbing together the poll date announcement of Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat, thereby giving an opportunity for the GST Council to meet and decide on a welcome reduction in the items attracting super high rates of tax. In order to clear the atmosphere of misapprehensions and unfortunate claims of lack of neutrality on the part of the ECI (claims that ought not to have been made so carelessly), the commission needs to clarify the reasons why it was forced to separate the poll dates announcements of Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat. Transparency has been sought ceaselessly by Prime Minister Modi, who has been working at his usual brisk pace to ensure the spread of digital system such that human error and bias get eliminated in decision making, and the ECI should draw a lesson from this and be more transparent about its reasoning and indeed its entire functioning, including why it takes so much longer to announce results despite EVMs than is the case in countries that use paper ballots which have laboriously to get counted ballot by ballot. In an age of lightning fast technology, it is inexcusable that the public has often to wait for days and sometimes weeks to learn the results of elections that have taken place. These should be announced within a few hours of the close of counting, in view of the superior technology that has been used in the machines, according to the Election Commission itself. The lengthy delays that take place in what gets touted as the world’s most populous democracy are wholly unnecessary and avoidable, and should be ended without delay. In the US, voters know who the next US President is soon after voting gets concluded, with delays occurring only very rarely, and that too never routinely as is the case in India.
Rather than prune the items on which 28% tax